特許庁の措置への対応
審査中に、要件や異議を含むオフィスアクションを受け取ることがあります。これは問題ではありません。弁護士はこれを分析し、戦略を立て、回答を準備します。
審査中に、要件や異議を含むオフィスアクションを受け取ることがあります。これは問題ではありません。弁護士はこれを分析し、戦略を立て、回答を準備します。
仕組み
1
数分以内にAIアシスタントでリクエストを作成し、数十人の地元の知的財産弁護士からオファーを受け取ることができます。
2
オファーを確認し、比較して、最適なオプションを選択してください。安全に取引を完了してください
3
プロセスが完了するまで、進捗状況を把握し、プラットフォームを通じて弁護士とコミュニケーションを取ります。
特許庁の措置への対応
$600から
-
数分以内に詳細な割り当てを作成するのに役立つ AI 搭載の IP アシスタント。
-
特定の基準に基づいて最も適切な現地の特許弁護士を選択します。
-
オフィスアクションの分析、対応戦略の策定、準備、および提出は弁護士によって行われます。
-
プロセス全体を通じてプラットフォーム上でオンライン監視とレポートを実行します。
なぜ iPNOTE なのか?
-
150か国以上から800以上の知的財産法律事務所、ランキングとレビュー
-
タスクの作成と関連する弁護士の検索を支援する AI 搭載の IP アシスタント
-
定額料金、安全で迅速なオンライン決済、結果保証
-
すべてのケースの登録プロセスとオンラインデータストレージに24時間365日アクセスできます
当社のクライアント
お客様の声
クリス
レイライトエナジー、中国
すごい、素晴らしいサービスです。プロバイダーは直接購入するよりもはるかに安いことがわかります。弁護士はすべて審査され、検証されているため、正当なサービスを購入しているかどうか疑問に思う必要はありません。これまでに 2 回使用しましたが、また使用する予定です。
マリア
シェリッジ、イギリス
一見すると、iPNOTE は専門家向けに設計されたプラットフォームです。しかし同時に、非常に役立つカスタマー サポートがあり、文字通り手作業ですべての段階をこなすことができました。クライアント中心であることは、ほぼすべてのステップを自動化しようとしている現代のデジタル サービスでは遺物的な機能です。
ジェフリー
Tyan Group LLC、米国
初めて利用しましたが、期待を裏切りませんでした。商標登録をすぐに申請してもらえました。イアンは私にすべてをわかりやすく説明してくれました。素晴らしいサービスと適正な価格です。また利用しようと思います。
よくある質問
特許庁審査官通知とは何ですか?
A patent Office Action is an official document issued by a patent office to inform the applicant of problems or concerns identified during the examination of a patent application. It typically includes rejections or objections related to legal and technical requirements such as novelty, inventive step, or clarity of claims.
What are common reasons for receiving an Office Action?
Applicants receive Office Actions when the examiner finds issues with the application. Common reasons include that the invention is not considered new or inventive, the claims are too broad or unclear, the description is insufficient, or prior art references disclose similar features.
How are non-final and final Office Actions different?
A non-final Office Action is usually the first communication that outlines the examiner’s concerns and gives the applicant a chance to address them. If the response does not fully resolve the issues, a final Office Action may follow, indicating that the examiner is not persuaded and further prosecution may require an appeal or a request for continued examination.
What is the usual timeline for responding to an Office Action?
Response deadlines vary by country. In the United States, responses are typically due within three months, with a possible extension of up to three more months. In Europe and Japan, the standard deadline is around three months. The exact deadline will be stated in the Office Action, and missing it can lead to the abandonment of the application.
Can I respond to an Office Action on my own?
While it is legally possible to respond on your own in many jurisdictions, doing so is risky without a solid understanding of patent law and examination standards. In some countries, especially if you're a foreign applicant, hiring a registered patent attorney or agent is required and strongly recommended for maximizing your chances of success.
What should a response to an Office Action include?
A response should directly address the examiner's concerns. It may include amendments to the claims or description, detailed arguments distinguishing the invention from prior art, clarifications, and sometimes supporting evidence or expert declarations. The tone should be professional and persuasive, focusing on both legal and technical aspects.
How do Office Action procedures vary worldwide?
While most countries issue Office Actions during patent examination, the procedures, formats, and legal expectations differ. For example, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) often provides detailed reasoning and allows several rounds of correspondence. The European Patent Office (EPO) has a strict format and deadlines, while offices like Japan’s JPO or China’s CNIPA follow their own procedural rules and may require translation or specific legal forms.
What happens if I fail to respond to an Office Action?
If you do not submit a timely response, the patent office will typically consider the application as abandoned or withdrawn. This means you lose the opportunity to secure patent rights for that invention unless there is a remedy available, such as reinstatement under limited conditions.
iPNOTEプラットフォームでの作業に関する必要な情報をすべて入手
Office Action Responses: Effective Strategies for Patent Prosecution Worldwide
When securing protection for innovations globally, inventors and businesses often face the critical task of crafting office action responses. These documents play a vital role in the prosecution process, determining the fate of applications across jurisdictions. Each patent authority has its own approach to evaluating claims, and understanding how to efficiently respond to objections or rejections is essential for success worldwide.
A well-prepared reaction to an examination notice can significantly improve the chances of invention grant. Whether the objection is related to novelty, inventive step, clarity, or formal issues, having a strong strategy tailored to the jurisdiction helps avoid unnecessary delays and costs. Due to varying rules and examination practices, responding correctly requires experience, technical knowledge, and familiarity with global procedures.
Key Elements in a Successful Reply
Applicants must analyze the examiner’s objections carefully and craft a reply that meets both legal and technical requirements. Failing to do so may result in rejection or abandonment of the application.
Some common issues raised in examination notices include:
- Lack of novelty or inventive step
- Ambiguity or indefiniteness in claims
- Insufficient disclosure in the specification
- Formal or procedural deficiencies
Each type of objection demands a specific approach. An effective examination notice procedure should address the examiner’s concerns in a clear, concise, and persuasive manner. Arguments must be supported with evidence, amendments must be precise, and any claim changes must comply with local laws.
Navigating Examination Notices Procedure Around the World
The procedures for handling examination notices vary significantly from one country to another. While the goal remains the same — obtaining a granted patent — the path to achieving it depends heavily on the rules of the local authority. Here's how worldwide jurisdictions typically differ in handling reactions:
- アメリカ合衆国: The USPTO allows for detailed argumentation and claim amendments. Strict timelines apply.
- ヨーロッパ: The EPO follows a structured examination process, with particular emphasis on clarity and support in the description.
- 日本: The JPO focuses on detailed technical explanations, often requiring deep understanding of engineering or scientific concepts.
- 中国: The CNIPA prioritizes efficiency but enforces strict formality and procedural compliance.
- インド: The procedure here requires attention to inventive steps and local legal interpretations.
Timely and accurate replies help maintain momentum in the process. Missing deadlines or submitting weak arguments can have significant consequences. Therefore, engaging professionals experienced in global prosecution is essential.
Steps to Take When Preparing an Office Action Response
Here is a checklist of actions that help streamline the process and improve success:
- Review the examination notice carefully to understand the scope of the examiner’s objections.
- Prepare a draft addressing each point logically and thoroughly.
- Analyze claim scope and decide if amendments are necessary to overcome rejections.
- Use technical support documents or drawings to clarify claims or improve understanding.
- Consult with foreign associates, if filing in unfamiliar jurisdictions.
- Track deadlines and procedural requirements, which may vary significantly across countries.
- File the examination notice reaction in a timely manner to avoid extensions or abandonment.
Conclusion
Replying effectively to examination notice is a critical component of international strategy. Each step requires careful review, technical insight, and procedural knowledge. By developing solid OA strategy, inventors and businesses can maximize the value of their innovations and achieve protection globally.
Mastering the art of invention reaction can turn objections into opportunities. Whether dealing with the USPTO, EPO, JPO, or any other national authority, having a structured and informed strategy ensures smoother prosecution and stronger IP assets across borders.
