Tanggapan Tindakan Kantor Paten
Selama pemeriksaan, Anda dapat menerima Tindakan Kantor yang mungkin mencakup persyaratan atau keberatan. Itu bukan masalah. Pengacara akan menganalisis ini, menyusun strategi, dan menyiapkan tanggapan
Selama pemeriksaan, Anda dapat menerima Tindakan Kantor yang mungkin mencakup persyaratan atau keberatan. Itu bukan masalah. Pengacara akan menganalisis ini, menyusun strategi, dan menyiapkan tanggapan
Bagaimana cara kerjanya
1
Dalam hitungan menit, buat permintaan dengan asisten AI dan terima penawaran dari puluhan pengacara IP lokal
2
Tinjau penawaran, bandingkan, dan pilih opsi yang paling sesuai. Selesaikan transaksi Anda dengan aman
3
Tetap terinformasi tentang kemajuan dan berkomunikasi dengan pengacara Anda melalui platform hingga prosesnya selesai
Tanggapan Tindakan Kantor Paten
Dari $600
-
Asisten IP bertenaga AI yang membantu Anda membuat tugas terperinci dalam hitungan menit.
-
Pemilihan pengacara paten lokal yang paling sesuai berdasarkan kriteria tertentu.
-
Analisis tindakan kantor, pengembangan strategi respons, persiapan, dan pengajuan dilakukan oleh seorang pengacara.
-
Pemantauan dan pelaporan daring pada platform selama keseluruhan proses.
Mengapa iPNOTE?
-
Lebih dari 800 firma hukum kekayaan intelektual dari 150+ negara, peringkat dan ulasan
-
Asisten IP bertenaga AI yang membantu membuat tugas dan menemukan pengacara yang relevan
-
Biaya tetap, pembayaran online aman dan cepat dengan hasil terjamin
-
Akses 24/7 ke proses pendaftaran dan penyimpanan data online untuk semua kasus Anda
Klien kami
Testimoni
kris
Raylightenergy, Tiongkok
Wah, layanan yang luar biasa dan Anda akan menemukan bahwa penyedianya jauh lebih murah daripada menggunakan jasa langsung. Semua pengacara telah disaring dan diverifikasi sehingga tidak perlu bertanya-tanya apakah Anda membeli layanan yang sah. Sudah menggunakannya dua kali sejauh ini dan akan menggunakannya lagi.
Maria
Sherridge, Inggris
Sekilas, iPNOTE adalah platform yang dirancang untuk para profesional. Namun, di saat yang sama, mereka memiliki layanan pelanggan yang sangat membantu, yang membantu saya melalui semua tahapan secara langsung. Berorientasi pada klien adalah fitur yang sudah tidak ada lagi dalam layanan digital modern yang mencoba mengotomatiskan hampir setiap langkah.
jeffrey
Tyan Group LLC, Amerika Serikat
Pertama kali menggunakan jasa mereka dan hasilnya tidak mengecewakan! Saya langsung mendapatkan hak merek dagang saya, dan Ian menjelaskan semuanya dengan jelas kepada saya! Layanan hebat dan harga yang wajar!! Berencana untuk menggunakan jasa mereka lagi!
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan
Apa itu Tindakan Kantor Paten?
A patent Office Action is an official document issued by a patent office to inform the applicant of problems or concerns identified during the examination of a patent application. It typically includes rejections or objections related to legal and technical requirements such as novelty, inventive step, or clarity of claims.
What are common reasons for receiving an Office Action?
Applicants receive Office Actions when the examiner finds issues with the application. Common reasons include that the invention is not considered new or inventive, the claims are too broad or unclear, the description is insufficient, or prior art references disclose similar features.
How are non-final and final Office Actions different?
A non-final Office Action is usually the first communication that outlines the examiner’s concerns and gives the applicant a chance to address them. If the response does not fully resolve the issues, a final Office Action may follow, indicating that the examiner is not persuaded and further prosecution may require an appeal or a request for continued examination.
What is the usual timeline for responding to an Office Action?
Response deadlines vary by country. In the United States, responses are typically due within three months, with a possible extension of up to three more months. In Europe and Japan, the standard deadline is around three months. The exact deadline will be stated in the Office Action, and missing it can lead to the abandonment of the application.
Can I respond to an Office Action on my own?
While it is legally possible to respond on your own in many jurisdictions, doing so is risky without a solid understanding of patent law and examination standards. In some countries, especially if you're a foreign applicant, hiring a registered patent attorney or agent is required and strongly recommended for maximizing your chances of success.
What should a response to an Office Action include?
A response should directly address the examiner's concerns. It may include amendments to the claims or description, detailed arguments distinguishing the invention from prior art, clarifications, and sometimes supporting evidence or expert declarations. The tone should be professional and persuasive, focusing on both legal and technical aspects.
How do Office Action procedures vary worldwide?
While most countries issue Office Actions during patent examination, the procedures, formats, and legal expectations differ. For example, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) often provides detailed reasoning and allows several rounds of correspondence. The European Patent Office (EPO) has a strict format and deadlines, while offices like Japan’s JPO or China’s CNIPA follow their own procedural rules and may require translation or specific legal forms.
What happens if I fail to respond to an Office Action?
If you do not submit a timely response, the patent office will typically consider the application as abandoned or withdrawn. This means you lose the opportunity to secure patent rights for that invention unless there is a remedy available, such as reinstatement under limited conditions.
Dapatkan semua informasi yang diperlukan tentang bekerja di platform iPNOTE
Office Action Responses: Effective Strategies for Patent Prosecution Worldwide
When securing protection for innovations globally, inventors and businesses often face the critical task of crafting office action responses. These documents play a vital role in the prosecution process, determining the fate of applications across jurisdictions. Each patent authority has its own approach to evaluating claims, and understanding how to efficiently respond to objections or rejections is essential for success worldwide.
A well-prepared reaction to an examination notice can significantly improve the chances of invention grant. Whether the objection is related to novelty, inventive step, clarity, or formal issues, having a strong strategy tailored to the jurisdiction helps avoid unnecessary delays and costs. Due to varying rules and examination practices, responding correctly requires experience, technical knowledge, and familiarity with global procedures.
Key Elements in a Successful Reply
Applicants must analyze the examiner’s objections carefully and craft a reply that meets both legal and technical requirements. Failing to do so may result in rejection or abandonment of the application.
Some common issues raised in examination notices include:
- Lack of novelty or inventive step
- Ambiguity or indefiniteness in claims
- Insufficient disclosure in the specification
- Formal or procedural deficiencies
Each type of objection demands a specific approach. An effective examination notice procedure should address the examiner’s concerns in a clear, concise, and persuasive manner. Arguments must be supported with evidence, amendments must be precise, and any claim changes must comply with local laws.
Navigating Examination Notices Procedure Around the World
The procedures for handling examination notices vary significantly from one country to another. While the goal remains the same — obtaining a granted patent — the path to achieving it depends heavily on the rules of the local authority. Here's how worldwide jurisdictions typically differ in handling reactions:
- Amerika Serikat: The USPTO allows for detailed argumentation and claim amendments. Strict timelines apply.
- Eropa: The EPO follows a structured examination process, with particular emphasis on clarity and support in the description.
- Jepang: The JPO focuses on detailed technical explanations, often requiring deep understanding of engineering or scientific concepts.
- Cina: The CNIPA prioritizes efficiency but enforces strict formality and procedural compliance.
- India: The procedure here requires attention to inventive steps and local legal interpretations.
Timely and accurate replies help maintain momentum in the process. Missing deadlines or submitting weak arguments can have significant consequences. Therefore, engaging professionals experienced in global prosecution is essential.
Steps to Take When Preparing an Office Action Response
Here is a checklist of actions that help streamline the process and improve success:
- Review the examination notice carefully to understand the scope of the examiner’s objections.
- Prepare a draft addressing each point logically and thoroughly.
- Analyze claim scope and decide if amendments are necessary to overcome rejections.
- Use technical support documents or drawings to clarify claims or improve understanding.
- Consult with foreign associates, if filing in unfamiliar jurisdictions.
- Track deadlines and procedural requirements, which may vary significantly across countries.
- File the examination notice reaction in a timely manner to avoid extensions or abandonment.
Conclusion
Replying effectively to examination notice is a critical component of international strategy. Each step requires careful review, technical insight, and procedural knowledge. By developing solid OA strategy, inventors and businesses can maximize the value of their innovations and achieve protection globally.
Mastering the art of invention reaction can turn objections into opportunities. Whether dealing with the USPTO, EPO, JPO, or any other national authority, having a structured and informed strategy ensures smoother prosecution and stronger IP assets across borders.
