Rispondere all'azione dell'ufficio brevetti
Durante l'esame, potresti ricevere un'azione d'ufficio che potrebbe includere requisiti o obiezioni. Non è un problema. L'avvocato analizzerà questo, elaborerà una strategia e preparerà una risposta
Durante l'esame, potresti ricevere un'azione d'ufficio che potrebbe includere requisiti o obiezioni. Non è un problema. L'avvocato analizzerà questo, elaborerà una strategia e preparerà una risposta
Come funziona
1
In pochi minuti, crea una richiesta con un assistente AI e ricevi offerte da decine di avvocati IP locali
2
Esamina le offerte, confrontale e seleziona l'opzione più adatta. Completa la tua transazione in modo sicuro
3
Rimani informato sui progressi e comunica con il tuo avvocato tramite la piattaforma fino al completamento del processo
Rispondere all'azione dell'ufficio brevetti
Da $600
-
Un assistente IP basato sull'intelligenza artificiale che ti aiuta a creare un incarico dettagliato in pochi minuti.
-
Selezione del consulente in brevetti locale più idoneo in base a criteri specifici.
-
Analisi delle azioni d'ufficio, sviluppo della strategia di risposta, preparazione e archiviazione eseguite da un avvocato.
-
Monitoraggio e reporting online sulla piattaforma durante l'intero processo.
Perché iPNOTE?
-
Oltre 800 studi legali specializzati in proprietà intellettuale da oltre 150 paesi, classifiche e recensioni
-
Un assistente IP basato sull'intelligenza artificiale che aiuta a creare attività e a trovare avvocati pertinenti
-
Tariffe fisse, pagamenti online sicuri e veloci con risultati garantiti
-
Accesso 24 ore su 24, 7 giorni su 7 al processo di registrazione e archiviazione dati online per tutti i tuoi casi
I nostri clienti
Testimonianze
Cristo
Raylightenergy, Cina
Wow, che servizio fantastico e scoprirai che i provider sono molto più economici di goig direct. Tutti gli avvocati sono selezionati e verificati, quindi non c'è bisogno di chiedersi se si sta acquistando un servizio legittimo. L'ho utilizzato due volte finora e lo utilizzerò di nuovo.
Maria
Sherridge, Regno Unito
A colpo d'occhio iPNOTE è una piattaforma progettata per i professionisti. Ma allo stesso tempo ha un servizio clienti così utile che mi ha aiutato a superare tutte le fasi letteralmente a mano. Essere orientati al cliente è una caratteristica reliquia per i moderni servizi digitali che cercano di automatizzare quasi ogni passaggio.
Jeffrey
Tyan Group LLC, Stati Uniti
È la prima volta che mi rivolgo a loro e non mi hanno deluso! Ho subito depositato il mio marchio registrato e Ian mi ha spiegato tutto in modo chiaro! Ottimo servizio e prezzo onesto!! Ho intenzione di rivolgermi di nuovo a loro!
Domande frequenti
Cos'è un'azione presso l'ufficio brevetti?
A patent Office Action is an official document issued by a patent office to inform the applicant of problems or concerns identified during the examination of a patent application. It typically includes rejections or objections related to legal and technical requirements such as novelty, inventive step, or clarity of claims.
What are common reasons for receiving an Office Action?
Applicants receive Office Actions when the examiner finds issues with the application. Common reasons include that the invention is not considered new or inventive, the claims are too broad or unclear, the description is insufficient, or prior art references disclose similar features.
How are non-final and final Office Actions different?
A non-final Office Action is usually the first communication that outlines the examiner’s concerns and gives the applicant a chance to address them. If the response does not fully resolve the issues, a final Office Action may follow, indicating that the examiner is not persuaded and further prosecution may require an appeal or a request for continued examination.
What is the usual timeline for responding to an Office Action?
Response deadlines vary by country. In the United States, responses are typically due within three months, with a possible extension of up to three more months. In Europe and Japan, the standard deadline is around three months. The exact deadline will be stated in the Office Action, and missing it can lead to the abandonment of the application.
Can I respond to an Office Action on my own?
While it is legally possible to respond on your own in many jurisdictions, doing so is risky without a solid understanding of patent law and examination standards. In some countries, especially if you're a foreign applicant, hiring a registered patent attorney or agent is required and strongly recommended for maximizing your chances of success.
What should a response to an Office Action include?
A response should directly address the examiner's concerns. It may include amendments to the claims or description, detailed arguments distinguishing the invention from prior art, clarifications, and sometimes supporting evidence or expert declarations. The tone should be professional and persuasive, focusing on both legal and technical aspects.
How do Office Action procedures vary worldwide?
While most countries issue Office Actions during patent examination, the procedures, formats, and legal expectations differ. For example, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) often provides detailed reasoning and allows several rounds of correspondence. The European Patent Office (EPO) has a strict format and deadlines, while offices like Japan’s JPO or China’s CNIPA follow their own procedural rules and may require translation or specific legal forms.
What happens if I fail to respond to an Office Action?
If you do not submit a timely response, the patent office will typically consider the application as abandoned or withdrawn. This means you lose the opportunity to secure patent rights for that invention unless there is a remedy available, such as reinstatement under limited conditions.
Ottieni tutte le informazioni necessarie per lavorare sulla piattaforma iPNOTE
Office Action Responses: Effective Strategies for Patent Prosecution Worldwide
When securing protection for innovations globally, inventors and businesses often face the critical task of crafting office action responses. These documents play a vital role in the prosecution process, determining the fate of applications across jurisdictions. Each patent authority has its own approach to evaluating claims, and understanding how to efficiently respond to objections or rejections is essential for success worldwide.
A well-prepared reaction to an examination notice can significantly improve the chances of invention grant. Whether the objection is related to novelty, inventive step, clarity, or formal issues, having a strong strategy tailored to the jurisdiction helps avoid unnecessary delays and costs. Due to varying rules and examination practices, responding correctly requires experience, technical knowledge, and familiarity with global procedures.
Key Elements in a Successful Reply
Applicants must analyze the examiner’s objections carefully and craft a reply that meets both legal and technical requirements. Failing to do so may result in rejection or abandonment of the application.
Some common issues raised in examination notices include:
- Lack of novelty or inventive step
- Ambiguity or indefiniteness in claims
- Insufficient disclosure in the specification
- Formal or procedural deficiencies
Each type of objection demands a specific approach. An effective examination notice procedure should address the examiner’s concerns in a clear, concise, and persuasive manner. Arguments must be supported with evidence, amendments must be precise, and any claim changes must comply with local laws.
Navigating Examination Notices Procedure Around the World
The procedures for handling examination notices vary significantly from one country to another. While the goal remains the same — obtaining a granted patent — the path to achieving it depends heavily on the rules of the local authority. Here's how worldwide jurisdictions typically differ in handling reactions:
- Stati Uniti: The USPTO allows for detailed argumentation and claim amendments. Strict timelines apply.
- Europa: The EPO follows a structured examination process, with particular emphasis on clarity and support in the description.
- Giappone: The JPO focuses on detailed technical explanations, often requiring deep understanding of engineering or scientific concepts.
- Cina: The CNIPA prioritizes efficiency but enforces strict formality and procedural compliance.
- India: The procedure here requires attention to inventive steps and local legal interpretations.
Timely and accurate replies help maintain momentum in the process. Missing deadlines or submitting weak arguments can have significant consequences. Therefore, engaging professionals experienced in global prosecution is essential.
Steps to Take When Preparing an Office Action Response
Here is a checklist of actions that help streamline the process and improve success:
- Review the examination notice carefully to understand the scope of the examiner’s objections.
- Prepare a draft addressing each point logically and thoroughly.
- Analyze claim scope and decide if amendments are necessary to overcome rejections.
- Use technical support documents or drawings to clarify claims or improve understanding.
- Consult with foreign associates, if filing in unfamiliar jurisdictions.
- Track deadlines and procedural requirements, which may vary significantly across countries.
- File the examination notice reaction in a timely manner to avoid extensions or abandonment.
Conclusion
Replying effectively to examination notice is a critical component of international strategy. Each step requires careful review, technical insight, and procedural knowledge. By developing solid OA strategy, inventors and businesses can maximize the value of their innovations and achieve protection globally.
Mastering the art of invention reaction can turn objections into opportunities. Whether dealing with the USPTO, EPO, JPO, or any other national authority, having a structured and informed strategy ensures smoother prosecution and stronger IP assets across borders.
